Case Study

IG&H – Data-driven selection for better hires

Challenge

IG&H aimed to make their selection process more objective and effective by implementing assessments for all open roles. The goal was to gain deeper insights into candidates' intelligence, competencies, motivations, and cultural preferences and analyze which traits contribute to a successful hire. In the first two years a total of 603 candidates were assessed.

Results

Selection based on intelligence: Hired candidates scored an average of 17% higher in intelligence compared to rejected candidates.

Better competency match: Hired candidates scored on average 4% higher on structured thinking, a key trait within IG&H.

Culture and motivations: Successful candidates value collaboration, professional growth, and personal development, while placing less importance on political awareness and internal competition.

High candidate satisfaction: Candidates rated the assessment experience 4 out of 5 stars, and 94% felt positive or neutral about IG&H after the assessment.

Conclusion

By consistently using assessments, IG&H has created a data-driven and more objective selection process. This has led to better hires, a stronger cultural fit, and higher satisfaction among both candidates and recruiters.

← All customer stories

IG&H – Data-driven selection for better hires

Client logo
Hero image

The Challenge

IG&H aimed to make their selection process more objective and effective by implementing assessments for all open roles. The goal was to gain deeper insights into candidates' intelligence, competencies, motivations, and cultural preferences and analyze which traits contribute to a successful hire. In the first two years a total of 603 candidates were assessed.

The Results

Selection based on intelligence: Hired candidates scored an average of 17% higher in intelligence compared to rejected candidates. Better competency match: Hired candidates scored on average 4% higher on structured thinking, a key trait within IG&H. Culture and motivations: Successful candidates value collaboration, professional growth, and personal development, while placing less importance on political awareness and internal competition. High candidate satisfaction: Candidates rated the assessment experience 4 out of 5 stars, and 94% felt positive or neutral about IG&H after the assessment. By consistently using assessments, IG&H has created a data-driven and more objective selection process. This has led to better hires, a stronger cultural fit, and higher satisfaction among both candidates and recruiters.

Latest customer stories

Pro_Job

Carrefour

Carrefour Belgium combined chat with scientifically validated assessments in one seamless flow connected to their ATS. The result: recruiters now spend 80% of their time on candidates who truly fit, with zero minutes wasted on admin and follow-up calls.

Read more →
Pro_Job

Aethon

Aethon partnered with Selection Lab and Byner to redesign their hiring flow with chat, a Situational Judgement Test, and integrated interview scheduling. The result: fewer drop-offs, fewer post-start surprises, and less early turnove, live within four weeks.

Read more →
Pro_Job

Teleperformance

Teleperformance optimized its recruitment process by introducing chat-based knock-out questions in collaboration with Selection Lab. Out of 501 invited candidates, 41% completed the screening and 14% passed, resulting in a more efficient and targeted selection process.

Read more →